Ernest Hemingway is known for his unique writing style. He uses a very short and straight to the point writing style that he introduced to the world in the 1900's. I, myself, usually enjoy long witty dialogue that is thought out and uses lot of descriptions and such. That is just about the complete opposite of Ernest Hemingway. I found that I actually enjoyed his extremely watered-down-way of explaining things, however. It was something different. At first I found it difficult to stay focused and actually comprehend what I was reading. After I got acclimated, though, I found it to be much easier to read and I got through the book quite fast because he did not take time to explain every little thing. He got down to the point. Hemingway used his short clipped way of speech to suck me in and keep me interested and I'm sure it has worked on may others, too. Other than his writing style, he also has mystery on his side. I know. Your reaction was probably 'Say whaaaaaat?' Yes, "The Old Man and the Sea" is not exactly the most secretive book out there, but when I was reading I really was not sure what was going to happen. I'm usually a pretty splendid guesser, too. Once he had gotten the fish strapped to the side of his skiff, I obviously saw what a problem the blood was going to be for the poor old man, but I never even fathomed Santiago would ferociously fight off as many sharks as he did. Frankly, I was not sure if he would actually make it back with a boat or not. Ernest Hemingway created and then planted those little ideas and questions in my head that I had to have answered. He engages his readers by making them think, 'What if??'
Hemingway, Ernest. The Old Man and the Sea. New York: Scribner, 1952. Print.